Technology

In an ideal world, technology would just work. I’m pretty comfortable using technology in my life and work and strongly believe that part of my job is to teach my students some computer and internet literacy (you don’t really believe they are “born” digital, do you?). It’s really exciting that universities everywhere now support this notion and we see more and more gadgets and services created for education and more and more classrooms being made into “smart classrooms”. What drives me nuts, however, is that often these classrooms are not so smart. Nothing is as seamless as it should be.

Despite having one of these so-called smart classrooms with a podium with integrated computer that is built in and connected to the projector, internet, speaker system, etc, I lugged my laptop to class all of last year. Why? Well, I needed to run i>Clicker, have a few websites pre-loaded, my presentation set up so I figured it was easier to do it from my computer. Maybe it was a habit from the days I used Keynote from my presentations and needed my mac to run it properly.

This year I decided I would simplify my life, stop carrying so many things to class, and simply use the podium. I did my homework – I looked up how to run i>clicker from a USB, had everything I needed set up. And it didn’t work. First, it took me a while to log into everything I needed open – prezi and blackboard. Then i>clicker turned out to be too slow running on the USB stick. Then the i>clicker base would not run. So I had to fidget with the different USB ports. I copied the i>clicker software to the desktop.  Then it wouldn’t show on top of the Prezi presentation running off the prezi website. So I copied the presentation to the desktop. Then the new-fangled updated version of the i>clicker software simply refused to show results. ARGH.

That’s it. Back to lugging my laptop. Another reason I should buy an Air.

Taking stock: the challenge of learning

Yesterday was the midterm test for the IFP class. I gave the final lecture for the semester last week and it’s now time to evaluate the semester and plan for next term. My challenge at the beginning of the term was to “sell” a world history course to non-history students. This has meant stressing the importance critical skills learned in the study of history would have in any other program at the Faculty of Arts and Science. Part of the aim of the course is also to integrate the students, all of whom are first-year international students, to the Canadian academic environment. This is where my experience transitioning from Brazil to Canada often comes in handy. I can think of aspects of our university culture in Canada that seem obvious to local students but which are not immediately apparent or understood when you come from a different academic environment, where the expectations are quite different.That the whole IFP team (1 coordinator, 5 language instructors, 2 TAs) has made my job much easier is an understatement.

Although the students are progressing satisfactorily, the course is going well, and everybody seems pleased, I still struggle on how to get my students to forget about their grades for a minute and focus on learning. It is difficult (perhaps utopian?) when their number one motivator is success and success is mostly evaluated in terms of grades rather than learning. My friend Rochelle Mazar has written about this unfortunate reality. In a post about blogging in education, she comments on the fact that our education system rewards unproductive success while ignoring productive failure. This means that a student that stumbled through his first assignments because he or she didn’t already possess the right skills but makes an effort and learns something new by the end of term, doesn’t do as well as the student who comes in with a background on the topic and the right skills and who get As from the very beginning. Of course I’m not the only one to attempt stabs at this particular windmill. The month’s University Affairs magazine presented the case of some universities that shunned grades altogether.

In my particular case, the concern for grades is, in a sense, self-imposed by my students. In the IFP, the students need to pass the history class I teach (and pass is 60%) and will get credit for it, but the course will not count towards their GPA.  And yet, they are all very stressed out about marks. One student was so upset with getting a B (75%) on his essay that he frustratingly exclaimed that he could get other people to write his essays. My fellow instructors and I get the sense that no matter how much we stress to them that it would be worth their while to engage in a bit of productive failure, to get out of their comfort zone, they simply don’t believe us.

If universities are places where individuals push boundaries, are innovative, develop new ways of looking at the past and thinking about the present, we need to think about ways in which students can be encouraged to practice a bit more productive failure. I have made only modest steps in this direction by creating a course blog and making students contribute with their reflection on the readings each week. They are encouraged to express themselves and at the end of the course they’ll be able to choose their three best posts, revise them, and submit for marking. I can sense, however, that many are still trying to figure out what I want to hear, rather than what they want to say. But there has certainly been some improvement from the beginning of the year. Let’s see what next term will bring.

History, videogames, and Prezi

For the third year in a roll, I gave a lecture to a group of high school students visiting the University of Toronto. This year I returned to the lecture I gave two years ago on the myth and history behind El Cid. In the lecture, we start with a discussion of how El Cid is portrayed in popular culture as a larger-than-life Christian hero before turning to a quick run down of what we actually know of the life of Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar and then end with an explanation of how the myth of El Cid was fashioned in the centuries after his death. It’s a fun lecture and this year I decided to move away from powerpoint/keynote and use Prezi instead. Check it out:

New tools – VoiceThread

It’s the end of another insanely busy academic year and only recently have I found a few minutes to spare comment here about a few new tools that I discovered thanks to Rochelle Mazar, the emerging technologies librarian at UTM. One such tools is VoiceThread, a tool that allows conversations around images, texts, or videos. This video illustrates the many features of this tool.

I was immediately taken by the pedagogical potential of this tool. It could be an interesting way to foster discussion around an image or video before class, for example, or even to continue in-class discussion. In that sense, it would allow for more inclusive teaching as it would allow students who are shy to express their views as well as allowing students to express their views not only in written form but also in spoken form (allowing perhaps for more in-depth comments). The interface itself is very clean and intuitive and hopefully wouldn’t scare the computer illiterate students.

At the very least, it could be a cool way of going through the class syllabus. To test the system, I uploaded a pdf of the syllabus for my recent course and had Rochelle add comments (both types and spoken comments). The comments took a few minutes to appear on my end, but I liked the way the system works, allowing comments to be placed near points in the text. This might actually be a better tool than wikis, for example, for allowing students to comment on each other’s work. The good thing is that it can also be embedded on webpages – so one could embed it on blackboard, for instance, or in a wiki page. The example below is the syllabus example I mentioned above. What do you think?

First class and wiki in the classroom

I taught my first lecture course this past summer. Entitled The Margins of Medieval Society, the course explored the way medieval people defined and dealt with heretics, Jews, Muslims, slaves, the poor, prostitutes, homosexuals, lepers, witches, and criminals. The structure of the course lent itself well for the intensive, six-week, summer schedule and the students seem to have enjoyed it as much as I did.

I had wanted to teach this course since I took an independent reading course on the topic as an undergraduate, about seven years ago. I proposed it to the history department last Fall, and to my great excitement, they took the course. I was to give two-hour lectures, twice a week for six weeks. Since I believe that the best way to learn is through a conversation, I split each two-hour block into a one hour lecture, followed by a 50-minute discussion after a few minutes break. Students were assigned a mixture of primary and secondary sources to read for each class, and were required to come to class prepared. Twenty percent of their mark was based on participation.

Such an emphasis on participation can be daunting, of course, since it shifts some responsibility for the course to the students. If the class doesn’t co-operate or students don’t come to class prepared, the instructor is faced with a wall of staring faces and an uncomfortable silence. In order to get the ball rolling and get a sense of what students got out of the assigned readings, I created a wiki page for the course. Each topic we covered had a wiki page and students had until noon on class days (we met at 5 pm) to post their reactions to the readings on the wiki site. I would then log on to the site at some point in the afternoon and bold passages that were particularly interesting or problematic to guide in-class discussions. I got the idea from Jeff McClurken, an American history professor at the University of Mary Washington who used it as discussion starter in many of his courses and wrote about it in his blog. He had had success in promoting engagement with the course material and interaction among students by using a wiki page. That encouraged me to give it a try despite the fact that I had never used a wiki before.

I have to say the wiki surpassed my expectations. I’ll know more when I get the students’ evaluations but several students told me they enjoyed it. One student told me she checked the site on her cellphone a few minutes before each class to see what I had marked off and felt it was useful for preparing for discussion. After the course was over she thanked me for introducing her to the wiki. She is currently using it at work to collaborate on a large project with several co-workers.

Having to post on the wiki led students to read more carefully and organize their thoughts about the topic covered before each class. They also began the discussion before class. Some students posted more than once as they often responded to each other’s posts. By the time we began discussion in class, they had been exposed to many different takes on the same readings. That allowed our discussions to reach a deeper level in the short time we had at our disposal.

Why I chose a wiki instead of a discussion forum
Although Blackboard offers a discussion forum tool, I felt setting up a wiki through pbworks was much easier than creating an effective forum, and the layout encouraged more interaction among the students. Despite commonly-held assumptions about younger generations, many students are not that tech savvy so I felt a forum structure would be more cumbersome. At the very least, students might simply post their individual thoughts without consulting other posts. I wanted a simpler structure, where each student’s reactions were easily available to the rest of the class. I also wanted a tool that would be simple to set up and maintain.

After seeing Jeff McClurken’s site, I knew a wiki could be the answer. I had recently started using a wiki when I joined a committee that is putting together an online portal of resources on the early modern Mediterranean. The group uses a wiki on pbworks to manage information and collaborate on developing the site. Having had to use it for that work showed me how easy it was from the user perspective.

After seeing how the wiki worked in my class, one of my friends implemented it in her summer courses at the University of Texas. After getting similar results, she decided to use it in all her classes. I’m now in the process of setting up a wiki for the class I’m TA’ing this year. In that class, however, I’m not requiring students to post at the wiki ahead of time. I’m basically going to use it to post guiding questions ahead of time and assignment instructions.  I’m basically interested in creating a course website that is more interactive than blackboard, where students can comment anything I post and ask questions publicly. After I finished setting up the wiki, I started having second thoughts. Perhaps in that case, a blog might be a better option. I’ll design one and compare the results.

Nothing like combining my love for new technology with my love for teaching!

Educause

Educause is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the application of information technology to higher education. At a conference in October 2008, Educause members began to work on a list of the top challenges in teaching and learning. Their main focus is not so much in highlighting the issues, but

to be an experiment in community interaction and participation, in organizing peers to develop solutions and approaches that can be shared across geographic boundaries and institutions. The list of challenges is merely the agenda, set by the community. The true focus of the Challenges project is on knowledge-building: challenging higher education not only to list the issues but also to put the power of collective intelligence into action to address those issues.

The Challenges project thus represents a shift in member engagement. Instead of “pushing out” content through webcasts, white papers, or articles, the Challenges project “invites in” content from members, asking the community to contribute ideas and solutions or to participate in “lightning-round” presentations. This is a shift reflected in the growing Web 2.0 culture. Whereas Web 1.0 was characterized by the ability to search for information, Web 2.0 has focused on the ability to contribute information and add to dialogues through rich tools like wikis, blogs, and social networks. [full text]

They have now narrowed it down to the top 5 challenges for 2009:

    • Creating learning environments that promote active learning, critical thinking, collaborative learning, and knowledge creation
    • Developing 21st-century literacies (information, digital, and visual) among students and faculty
    • Reaching and engaging today’s learners
    • Encouraging faculty adoption and innovation in teaching and learning with IT
    • Advancing innovation in teaching and learning with technology in an era of budget cuts

      It’s definitely worth a read. I’m applying some of the principles in my class next month and I’ll reflect here on how successful it was at the end.